This report explores present and future different optical coherence tomography techniques and their usage and developments within the OCT market. This report includes different types of optical coherence tomography techniques such as time domain and large-field high-speed polarization sensitive system, Fourier domain or spectral domain and time-encoded frequency domain or swept source, full-field optical coherence and optical delay scanning. The improvisation of the market, the setbacks and the needs of the market are discussed in this report. The classification, new developments and usage of these types of techniques are also portrayed in this report. A detailed analysis of the OCT (optical coherence tomography) industry has been conducted. Revenues are broken down by region. Sales figures are estimated for the five-year period from 2012 through 2017.
Applications for OCT are also discussed in this report, with an emphasis of the usage of this technique in different therapeutic categories and various other industries. This report, “Global Markets and Technologies for Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)“, also covers significant patents and their allotments in each category. Acquisition strategies and collaborations by companies are also covered in this report. This study also discusses the strength and weaknesses of each type/ technology in light of the new technologies, growing competition and changing customer needs.
Extensive research in the OCT field has revealed its current usage in various applications and its usage in the future. The report also covers current research and developments going on in this field. This report also discusses the usage of OCT techniques over other current imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound imaging.
Researchers are exploring the advantages of OCT in newer areas, leading to the increased usage and consumption of these techniques. R&D spending, patents and research in this field are giving a new direction. The advancements, new product launches and the early disease detection awareness influenced the market to grow in the foreseeable future. This study looks at almost all of the systems affected by these factors.
Scope of the Report (http://www.reportsnreports.com/reports/247348-global-markets-and-technologies-for-optical-coherence-tomography-oct-.html) covers:
The scope of this study embraces OCT in medical and other markets. BCC analyzed each market and its applications, regulatory environment, technology, market projections and market shares. Technological issues include the latest trends and developments. The emerging markets for OCT include countries such as India, China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Africa, Australia, New Zealand, etc.
Companies Profiled in this report include: Agfa Healthcare, Agiltron Incorporated, Bayspec, Inc., Bioptigen, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Heidelberg Engineering, Heliotis Ag, Imalux Corporation, Lightlab Imaging, Michelson Diagnostics, Nidek Co., Ltd., Novacam Technologies Inc., Nine Point Medical, Optos, Optovue, Inc., Optopol Technology S.A., Phoenix Research Laboratories, Inc., P&P Optica, Santec Corporation, Shenzhen Moptim Imaging Technique Co., Tomey, Tomophase Corporation, Topcon Medical Systems, Inc., Tornado Spectral Systems and Thorlabs Inc.
List of Tables
Summary Table : Global Revenue of Oct Market, Through 2017
Table 1 : Main Characteristics of Oct
Table 2 : Uses of Optical Coherence Tomography
Table 3 : Advantages and Disadvantages of Optical Coherence Tomography
Table 4 : Applications of Optical Coherence Tomography
Table 5 : Historical Developments In Optical Coherence Tomography
Table 6 : Type of Technologies Used In Optical Coherence Tomography
Table 7 : Modes of Implementation In Optical Coherence Tomography
Table 8 : Comparison of Different Oct Technology
Table 9 : New Oct Products Approved From 2008 To 2012
Table 10 : Recalls and Safety Alerts From 2008 To 2012
Table 11 : New Oct Innovations From 2008 To 2012
Table 12 : Pipeline Products for the Oct Market
Table 13 : Global Revenue of Oct By Type, Through 2017
Table 14 : Market Shares of Oct By Type, 2011
Table 15 : Global Revenue of Oct By Region, Through 2017
Table 16 : Global Market Share of Oct By Region, 2011
Table 17 : Global Revenue of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct By Region, Through 2017
Table 18 : Market Share of Global Revenue of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct By Region, 2011
Table 19 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct By Region, Through 2017
Table 20 : Market Share of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct By Region, 2011
Table 21 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By Region, Through 2017
Table 22 : Market Share of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By Region, 2011
Table 23 : Global Market of Oct By End Users, Through 2017
Table 24 : Global Market Share of Oct By End Users, 2011
Table 25 : Global Revenue of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct, Through 2017
Table 26 : Market Share of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct By Type, 2011
Table 27 : Global Revenue of Td-Oct By Region, Through 2017
Table 28 : Global Revenue of Ps-Oct By Region, Through 2017
Table 29 : Market Share of Ps-Oct By Region, 2011
Table 30 : Global Revenue of Ps-Oct and Td-Oct By End Users, Through 2017
Table 31 : Global Expenditure of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct In the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industries, Through 2017
Table 32 : Global Expenditure of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct In the Environmental Sciences Industry, Through 2017
Table 33 : Global Expenditure of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct In the Food and Beverage Industry, Through 2017
Table 34 : Global Expenditure of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct In Other Industries, Through 2017
Table 35 : Market Share of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct By Application, 2011
Table 36 : Major Manufacturers In Td-Oct, 2011
Table 37 : Market Share for Manufacturers In Td-Oct, 2011
Table 38 : Major Manufacturers In Ps-Oct, 2011
Table 39 : Market Share for the Manufacturers In Ps-Oct, 2011
Table 40 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct By Type, Through 2017
Table 41 : Market Share of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct, 2011
Table 42 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct By Region, Through 2017
Table 43 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct By Region, Through 2017
Table 44 : Global Revenue of Time-Encoded Oct By Region, Through 2017
Table 45 : Market Shares of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct By Region, 2011
Table 46 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct By End Users, Through 2017
Table 47 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Domain Oct In Cardiology, Through 2017
Table 48 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct In Ophthalmology, Through 2017
Table 49 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct In Oncology, Through 2017
Table 50 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct In Other Sectors, Through 2017
Table 51 : Market Share of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct, 2011
Table 52 : Major Manufacturers In Fourier Or Spectral Domain Oct, 2011
Table 53 : Market Share of the Manufacturers In Fourier Or Spectral Domain Oct, 2011
Table 54 : Major Manufacturers In Time-Encoded Oct Or Ss-Oct, 2011
Table 55 : Market Share of the Manufacturers of Time-Encoded Oct Or Ss-Oct, 2011
Table 56 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct, Through 2017
Table 57 : Market Share of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By Type, 2011
Table 58 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By Region, Through 2017
Table 59 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct By Region, Through 2017
Table 60 : Global Revenue of Od-Oct By Region, Through 2017
Table 61 : Market Share of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By Region, 2011
Table 62 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By End Users, Through 2017
Table 63 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct In Endoscopy, Through 2017
Table 64 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct In Oncology, Through 2017
Table 65 : Global Expenditure of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct In Interstitial Cell Studies, Through 2017
Table 66 : Global Expenditure of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct In Other Categories, Through 2017
Table 67 : Market Share of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By End Users, 2011
Table 68 : Major Manufacturers In Ff-Oct, 2011
Table 69 : Market Share for Manufacturers In Ff-Oct, 2011
Table 70 : Major Manufacturers In Od-Oct, 2011
Table 71 : Market Share for Manufacturers In Od-Oct, 2011
Table 72 : Number of U.S. Patents By Year, From 2008 To 2012
Table 73 : Number of U.S. Patents By Type, From 2008-2012
Table 74 : Number of U.S. Patents By Company, From 2008–October 2012
Table 75 : Number of U.S. Patents By Country, From 2008-2012
Table 76 : Number of U.S. Patents By Assignee, From 2008-2012
List of Figures
Summary Figure : Global Revenue of Oct Market, 2010-2017
Figure 1 : Global Revenue of Oct By Type, 2010-2017
Figure 2 : Market Shares of Oct By Type, 2011
Figure 3 : Global Revenue of Oct By Region, 2010-2017
Figure 4 : Global Market Share of Oct By Region, 2011
Figure 5 : Global Revenue of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct By Region, 2010-2017
Figure 6 : Market Share of Global Revenue of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct By Region, 2011
Figure 7 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct By Region, 2010-2017
Figure 8 : Market Share of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct By Region, 2011
Figure 9 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By Region, 2010-2017
Figure 10 : Market Share of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By Region, 2011
Figure 11 : Global Market of Oct By End Users, 2010-2017
Figure 12 : Global Market Share of Oct By End Users, 2011
Figure 13 : Global Revenue of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct, 2010-2017
Figure 14 : Market Share of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct By Type, 2011
Figure 15 : Global Revenue of Td-Oct By Region, 2010-2017
Figure 16 : Global Revenue of Ps-Oct By Region, 2010-2017
Figure 17 : Market Share of Ps-Oct By Region, 2011
Figure 18 : Global Revenue of Ps-Oct and Td-Oct By End Users, 2010-2017
Figure 19 : Global Expenditure of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct In the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industries, 2010-2017
Figure 20 : Global Expenditure of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct In the Environmental Sciences Industry, 2010-2017
Figure 21 : Global Expenditure of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct In the Food and Beverage Industry, 2010-2017
Figure 22 : Global Expenditure of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct In Other Industries, 2010-2017
Figure 23 : Market Share of Td-Oct and Ps-Oct By Application, 2011
Figure 24 : Market Share for Manufacturers In Td-Oct, 2011
Figure 25 : Market Share for the Manufacturers In Ps-Oct, 2011
Figure 26 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct By Type, 2010-2017
Figure 27 : Market Share of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct, 2011
Figure 28 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct By Region, 2010-2017
Figure 29 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct By Region, 2010-2017
Figure 30 : Global Revenue of Time-Encoded Oct By Region, 2010-2017
Figure 31 : Market Shares of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct By Region, 2011
Figure 32 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct By End Users, 2010-2017
Figure 33 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Domain Oct In Cardiology, 2010-2017
Figure 34 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct In Ophthalmology, 2010-2017
Figure 35 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct In Oncology, 2010-2017
Figure 36 : Global Revenue of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct In Other Sectors, 2010-2017
Figure 37 : Market Share of Fd-Oct and Time-Encoded Oct, 2011
Figure 38 : Market Share of the Manufacturers In Fourier Or Spectral Domain Oct, 2011
Figure 39 : Market Share of the Manufacturers of Time-Encoded Oct Or Ss-Oct, 2011
Figure 40 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct, 2010–2017
Figure 41 : Market Share of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By Type, 2011
Figure 42 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By Region, 2010-2017
Figure 43 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct By Region, Through 2017
Figure 44 : Global Revenue of Od-Oct By Region, 2010-2017
Figure 45 : Market Share of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By Region, 2011
Figure 46 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By End Users, 2010-2017
Figure 47 : Global Revenue of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct In Endoscopy, 2010-2017
Figure 48 : Global Review of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct In Oncology, 2010-2017
Figure 49 : Global Expenditure of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct In Interstitial Cell Studies, 2010-2017
Figure 50 : Global Expenditure of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct In Other Categories, 2010-2017
Figure 51 : Market Share of Ff-Oct and Od-Oct By End Users, 2011
Figure 52 : Market Share for Manufacturers In Ff-Oct, 2011
Figure 53 : Market Share for Manufacturers In Od-Oct, 2011
Figure 54 : Number of U.S. Patents By Year, From 2008 To 2012
Figure 55 : Number of U.S. Patents By Type, From 2008–2012
Figure 56 : Number of U.S. Patents By Assignee, From 2008–2012
Contact [email protected] for further information.